Search for: "Plaintiffs 3-30"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,673
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2013, 10:14 am
The court interpreted the Healthcare Services Lien Act to decide that the plaintiff gets 30% of the judgment. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:54 am
") Published: 3/30/2015 11:49 AM [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:48 am
") Published: 3/30/2015 11:41 AM [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:40 am
") Published: 3/30/2015 11:31 AM [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:42 am
") Published: 3/30/2015 12:20 PM [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 9:13 am
Id. at 3. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Sept. 30, 2019). [read post]
21 May 2014, 3:00 am
§ 1446(b)(3). [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:11 am
Id. at *3-4. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:38 am
") Published: 3/30/2011 11:37 AM [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 2:34 pm
P. 30(d)(1), they could have cancelled the deposition at any time without penalty. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 1:10 pm
(Martorella Affirm, dated 3/18/11, Ex E.) [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:48 pm
The Court noted that the evidence showed that the police officer responding to the accident estimated plaintiff’s speed at 43 miles per hour, while the speed limit was 30 miles per hour. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:54 pm
If a Defendant chose to disclose its source code, [plaintiff] was obligated to amend its P.R. 3-1(c) chart(s), incorporating the source code, within 30 days. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 12:03 pm
In my view, it is appropriate that the defendants be liable to pay those costs. [30] Here, the plaintiff achieved substantial success, that, as I have said, would be defeated if costs were awarded in accordance with the usual rule. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Noting that Civil Service Law §75(3) was incorporated into the CBA under Article XVII(4)(B), the Appellate Division agreed with the employer that since the CBA and Civil Service Law §75(3) both permit back-pay awards only for periods of improper suspension, even if the grievant was suspended improperly and held that the arbitrators exceeded their power by awarding Plaintiff back pay for a period of time following his voluntary retirement.Accordingly, the… [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:51 am
In dismissing the complaints with leave to amend, the court gave plaintiffs 30 days to remedy the insufficiencies of their allegations. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 12:05 pm
Step 2: At the second trial, the jury awards the plaintiff $8 million, $3 million more than the plaintiff’s counsel sought during summation.Step 3: Last week, the trial judge ordered trial counsel for plaintiff to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for improper conduct in closing. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 9:15 am
Kroll settled an automobile accident case for more than $3 million. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 8:17 pm
(2) Were the transcripts inadmissible, and without them, was there sufficient evidence to support the finding that the plaintiff had violated Section 3-28? [read post]
